NASA Chief Mike Griffin's Interesting 50th Anniversary Comments

Recently, Michael Griffin (Administrator, a.k.a the chief, of NASA) made some interesting comments to the Agency France-Presse (AFP) when discussing the 50th anniversary of NASA and NASA's current state:

"[Christopher Columbus] travelled for months and spent a few weeks in the Americas and returned home. He could hardly have said to have explored the New World. So we have just begun to touch other worlds."

-Mike Griffin, referring to Apollo 11's first walk on the Moon

Mr. Griffin went on to talk about how the explorers of the 15th century set out not knowing exactly what they'd find, and what value it would have. Griffin stated, "We can't prove today that we can exploit what we find to the benefit of humankind", though personally I beg to differ (and so do others more significant than me).

Griffin also expresses support for international cooperation, a subject that was a key contrast between the Obama and McCain space plans (with Obama's plan mentioning it often and McCain's plan never mentioning it).

"The space station is much bigger and better and more impressive and more productive as a result of the partnership with Canada, Russia, Europe, and Japan, than it would have been if we had done it ourselves."

-Mike Griffin

For some more interesting Mike Griffin interviews, check out this Popular Mechanics '10 tough questions' from 2007, and a Space.com grilling from about a month ago on the space shuttle program, changes to it, and the potential impact of that on Constellation. Seems like Mr. Griffin gets some tough gigs with these interviews, haha.

(Note: I think that 8.8mb portrait from NASA of Mr. Griffin is one of the largest images I have ever seen uploaded to the internet.)

A Look at John McCain's Space Plan

After recently taking a look at Barack Obama's detailed space plan, it's now time to sit down and take a gander at his counterpart John McCain's own plan for our spacefaring future.

While McCain's plan is only about a third of the length of Obama's (989 words to 3,486), there's still enough information and context that can be discerned from it to give an idea of what a McCain administration's space policy could shape up to be like.

• Batting leadoff is this first-sentence statement : "For the past 50 years, space activities have contributed greatly to US scientific discovery, national security, economic development, and national innovation, pride and power." The placement of "national security" second on that list is notable, and not a surprise given McCain's military background.
• The plan goes on to briefly discuss Sputnik, the reaction to it, and how that led to a dominance in American science and technology, noting: "The end of the Cold War and the space race has greatly reduced the profile of space exploration as a point of national pride...", creating a "degree of 'mission-rut'" for NASA.
• After noting "Much of our communications infrastructure is dependent upon space based assets that are essential to the quality of our everyday lives and the economy", the report goes on to detail how China, Russia, India, Japan and Europe are all "active players" in space exploration.
• McCain then writes briefly about the increasing activity in the commerical sector and mentions the Google Lunar X Prize and space tourism, specifically noting the "importance of investments in key industries such as space to the future of our national security, environmental sustainability, economic competitiveness, and national pride as a technological leader"; again, a distinct foreign policy lean with national security being first on the list and "competitiveness" and "pride" being in there also.
• An entire paragraph is devoted to discussion of the following quote regarding the Nixon administration's mulling of the cancellation of Apollo and non-approval of the Space Shuttle:

"[That policy] ...would be confirming in some respects a belief that I fear is gaining credence at home and abroad: That our best years are behind us, that we are turning inward, reducing our defense commitments, and voluntarily starting to give up our super-power status and our desire to maintain world superiority."

-Casper Weinberger, Office of Management and Budget Deputy Director, 1971

• McCain then states, rather significantly, that "Three and a half decades later this seems equally valid, if not more so given the increased number of countries that are making significant investments in space."

The report then concludes with a little on McCain's contributions to the space program as a Senator and on NASA's current policies and projects.

McCain's last statement about Weinberger's quote, combined with the foreign policy leaning of the plan, clearly illustrates that McCain sees Constellation and the rest of NASA's programs as key to American international standing, prestige, and competitiveness.

This is somewhat of a contrast to Obama's plan, which has a focus that is notably more domestic, primarily discussing the private sector. A perhaps even more notable contrast is that while Obama's plan discusses international cooperation quite a bit, it is something that is not mentioned a single time in McCain's plan.

The differences in the two plans are fascinating, and more than I would have expected, illustrating that this is definitely a subject that both candidates take very seriously, and that they both have their own distinctive styles towards handling.

Picture of the Week: What Ocean?

The above is a picture of two ESA astronauts, André Kuipers and Frank de Winne, training underwater at a Houston NASA facility. The ESA is actively recruiting astronauts as it explores its Moon mission options, with cooperation (like the training above) and more concrete indications of plans to work together on the moon becoming more and more common as of late.

Russian/European Joint, Manned Spacecraft Design Unveiled (News)

The replacement for the oft-used Russian Soyuz craft was unveiled today, and it is a joint project by the European Space Agency and the Russian Federal Space Agency(Roscosmos):


Designed by Russian space firm RKK Energia, this is a craft planned to be used for lunar missions, effectively being the counterpart to NASA's Ares/Orion lunar-mission tag team (which I profiled briefly here at Luna C/I back in May). In NASA's case, the Ares is the launch module and the Orion the manned portion; this new craft is a manned craft, with the launch vehicle undetermined and (as noted in the linked BBC news article) possibly being either an entirely new vehicle or a modified existing Russian rocket.

The Russian-European plans to collaborate are not a set-in-stone agreement, and so the ESA does have a backup plan to continue should the partnership with Roscosmos fall through. Still, it's promising to see signs of this sort of high-level collaboration working, as opposed to, say, tense and outright competition that could lead to cynical (perhaps silly?) 'war in space' scenarios. In my view, if there's a time for humanity to start moving on from the more petty social-geopolitical problems of Earth, this is it. Do we really need to go start churning out terms like "lunapolitical conflict"?

But, for the time being, we have developments like this tentative Euro-Russian agreement (and other cooperation efforts) to nudge things towards what I see, at least for now, as a positive direction.